Hello! This website was last updated: December 22nd, 2025: 10:23 p.m. EST
For a little bit about me, I am an interdenominational Christian, but for the most part, I would consider myself Oriental Orthodox, which is a distinct denomination from "orthodoxy" like the Russian Orthodox Church and includes the following churches,
A Short list of Denominations I would be okay with considering myself are as follows (in order), Coptic Orthodox, Ethiopian Tewahedo, Moravian Brotherhood, Schwartzenhau Brethren, Pietist Lutheran, Episcopal/Anglican, Quaker, Messianic Judaism, and Old Catholicism. Furthermore a list of denominations in order that I could understand and be with, if those weren't options, would be Calvinist/Presbyterian, Catholic, Assyrian COTE, Eastern Orthodox, Adventists, and (maybe) Universalists.
Now of course, I cannot be all of these things. All of these people have different views of Christology, Salvation, Trinitiarology, etc. However, when I saw that I could be any of these, it means that I could adapt my viewpoints slightly in order to follow the group, and I would be at least okay with that. And sure, there might be some differences, but overall, we could agree on most stuff. Furthermore, I have taken inspiration from a great deal of these denominations and applied them into my own theology, ideas, and reading of the canon/non-canon books. For example, I have a very broad personal canon, which includes Third Book of Maccabees, but I am also not very opposed to considering other non-canonical books within my own broader "personal theology." (obviously non-canonical books are not suposed to make doctrinal power over the other, but just as religious readings.) And because of this, I have read The Shepard of Hermes, which I believe to have expressed views of Binitarianism which I will get into more, however, this is one of the ideas that I have been playing around with recently. This is not really considered theology by any major religious group besides a few small ones (which I end up disagreeing with on more issues, and therefore kind of balances out) but I believe that there is a pretty good chance that the pre-nicean creed christians were probably split between binitarianism and trinitarianism. This is not something to go found a church out of, however; at least not in my opinion, especially since I do not have any authority to do so, but it is one of those things that I have held decently close to me.
And I believe that this is the best representation of where I fall. You can see here, there are a lot of denominations that I agree with. And obviously some more than others, I hold the oriental orthodox churches to be the most to my heart, however, I would also be interested in going to some of them in A, and some in B. I am very interested in the Schwartzenhau Brethren, I am also very interested in the Moravians; Dutch Reforms, and Quakers. I believe that this is indeed where I am right now. However, almost all of these don't hold the view of Miaphysitism which is something that I hold very important. (Which is why all the Oriental Orthodox Denominations are in the highest tier) and obviously, a tierlist is one of the least good methods of communication in terms of a complex, religious question; but I believe gets the point acrost well enough.
And I hope that this website, as of now, can be used as a kind of echo-field for my own ideas; to challenge the ideas that I already have, bring about new ideas, and word-out the kind of suppressed ideas that may not be in the majority of churches. Another thing that you will note is that I placed the Binitarian Churches higher than I would've done, because they hold Binitarianism. I do not agree with these churches on pretty much everything that they say, the highest one claims that evolution is a hoax to make people disbelieve in god (which is obviously not true, I mean get a grip on yourself) but they are still higher than United Church of Christ, which I believe is a perfectly valid form of Christianity, and while I believe that saints and iconography are important, I also can see how simple, quiet, community worship can impact someone in a deeper way, especially for a christian who may view iconography as weird, in a lot more of a personal, and spiritual way than a big church with ringing bells, foreign and ancient languages, and complex rituals. While I believe that that is the "right" way, I also believe that other forms, espeically communical gatherings of believers, to be as equally biblical. In fact, I would go as far as to say that both the very structured, high-church style is equally as spirtual as the very low-church, simple congregations.